Webinars as a Knowledge Sharing Platform for eHealth in South and Southeast Asia

Setting up fully functional national eHealth systems is a challenge. Developing eHealth capacities in Asia can be achieved through distance learning such as webinars. The Asia eHealth Information Network (AeHIN) is a community of about 900 professionals in South and Southeast Asia, convened as a peer group dedicated to strengthening local health systems through the use of information and communications technology. It organised the AeHIN Hour held twice monthly as a venue for knowledge sharing. This paper will describe and analyse the context, inputs, processes and products of the AeHIN Hour webinars implemented over 47 months. Data is analysed through review of literature and AeHIN Hour technical reports. Analysis revealed that the AeHIN Hour provides individuals with a platform to learn and establish connections with other experts and like-minded individuals who could assist them in their current health system strengthening efforts. AeHIN paves the way for countries to recognise challenges and issues they face which are important for substantiating existing technical assistance. Shared interests among stakeholders sustain the activity. Management of the AeHIN Hour should be strengthened in order to maximise its value in building capacities among country-level actors who would shape the course of health systems strengthening

Implementation of Telemedicine Services in Lower-Middle Income Countries: Lessons for the Philippines

Regardless of the promising potential of telemedicine to address healthcare problems, especially in lower-middle income countries, its success rate has been unsatisfactory and many telemedicine services fail to sustain their implementation shortly after initial funding or after a pilot phase. Therefore, it is important to document existing models of telemedicine implementation in these countries, to identify commonalities and extract experiences that would be useful for implementers, policy makers and future researchers. This review seeks to review and describe the experience of Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) in implementing telemedicine services. Evidence extracted from the included studies were analysed through a narrative synthesis which suggests a multi-sectoral approach for implementing telemedicine. It highlights the importance of education, financing options, policy, technology, governance, and partnership, in the wider picture of a sustainable telemedicine implementation among developing countries such as the Philippines. Moreover, the literature reveals both top-down and bottom-up approach for successful telemedicine implementation. These approaches include strengthening the local health workers and integrating telemedicine into the health system. Studies included in this review have been helpful, but there is an obvious lack of studies with high level of evidence that can yield generalisable, thus findings must be inferred with prudence. Even so, this review described and summarised the data which allowed description of factors and lessons in the implementation of telemedicine in LMICs

The Role of Telehealth in Disaster Management: Lessons for the Philippines

According to the WorldRiskIndex 2016, the Philippines is the third country most at risk of disasters in the world. Typhoon Haiyan, the strongest on local record, caused widespread destruction to life and property. Current disaster management strategies in the country do not include telehealth as a formal tool in disaster mitigation, response, or recovery. This study reviewed research incorporating telehealth in disaster management from multiple low and lower middle income countries like the Philippines to address this gap by identifying lessons the country might be able to adopt. Studies show that most initiatives centre on evaluating telehealth’s effectiveness during the response phase. Unsurprisingly, mobile technology and satellite communications predominated, and most projects were launched using donor funding. Use of telehealth in disaster management in the Philippines could begin by recognising and including telehealth in formal government protocols. The government could leverage the National Telehealth Service Program of the University of the Philippines National Telehealth Center. Documentation and systematic research on telehealth’s expected positive contributions to disaster preparedness and response should also be initiated

A new tool for evaluating health equity in academic journals; the Diversity Factor.

Current methods to evaluate a journal's impact rely on the downstream citation mapping used to generate the Impact Factor. This approach is a fragile metric prone to being skewed by outlier values and does not speak to a researcher's contribution to furthering health outcomes for all populations. Therefore, we propose the implementation of a Diversity Factor to fulfill this need and supplement the current metrics. It is composed of four key elements: dataset properties, author country, author gender and departmental affiliation. Due to the significance of each individual element, they should be assessed independently of each other as opposed to being combined into a simplified score to be optimized. Herein, we discuss the necessity of such metrics, provide a framework to build upon, evaluate the current landscape through the lens of each key element and publish the findings on a freely available website that enables further evaluation. The OpenAlex database was used to extract the metadata of all papers published from 2000 until August 2022, and Natural language processing was used to identify individual elements. Features were then displayed individually on a static dashboard developed using TableauPublic, which is available at www.equitablescience.com. In total, 130,721 papers were identified from 7,462 journals where significant underrepresentation of LMIC and Female authors was demonstrated. These findings are pervasive and show no positive correlation with the Journal's Impact Factor. The systematic collection of the Diversity Factor concept would allow for more detailed analysis, highlight gaps in knowledge, and reflect confidence in the translation of related research. Conversion of this metric to an active pipeline would account for the fact that how we define those most at risk will change over time and quantify responses to particular initiatives. Therefore, continuous measurement of outcomes across groups and those investigating those outcomes will never lose importance. Moving forward, we encourage further revision and improvement by diverse author groups in order to better refine this concept